> :>The next most efficient technique after using a sanctioned slot in the area > referenced by ECVTCTBL is Name/Token services. A System-level Name/Token in > would be needed in this case. > > I wonder if IBM has reserved some for the installation.
Nope. It's for vendors - mainly to keep them out of the BCP's pants. Ooh, did I say that out loud? My bad. > Of course, there is the ancient technique of anchoring the SITECVT address in > CVTUSER. Faster than ECVTCTBL. The CVTUSER and TCBUSER fields have always been worthless precisely because you can't count on them. There's no documented interface, so nobody actually uses them - or at least not without taking their hero pills and pulling on the kevlar undies first. CC
