On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:18:52 -0400 "Robert A. Rosenberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
:>At 09:25 +0300 on 04/12/2013, Binyamin Dissen wrote about Re: Storage :>and Tokens: :> :>>Of course, there is the ancient technique of anchoring the SITECVT address in :>>CVTUSER. Faster than ECVTCTBL. :> :>The only problem with this is insuring that your code is the ONLY :>user of CVTUSER. I have the impression that some ISV code (or someone :>else) used to use this location and thus you needed to have a way of :>using it to anchor a chain of pointers off of it and have code to :>allow addition and deletion of pointer entries to that chain. That is what I meant by SITECVT. The sysprogs at the site control the block. Of course ISV code cannot use it. The OP was wondering how he could anchor data at his site. CVTUSER is a perfectly legitimate use for that. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies.
