Sam, We are thinking about modifying our original design...we need one additional subtask to handle racf commands and password requests so, I am trying to figure out how to retrofit our cobol code with assembler changes so I can multitask ...I am looking over your example you sent me sometime ago ...between crazy customer requests .....
Scott ford www.identityforge.com from my IPAD 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means' > On Nov 25, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Sam Siegel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Scott - Yes ... at the high-level this seems correct. > > I'm assuming that the mainline will be doing other work while the sub-task > is running. > > If the task which attaches the sub-task abends, the sub-task will also be > abended by z/OS. So you will probably need to consider how the sub-task > handles unexpected abend conditions in addition to handling > abends/return-codes related to the tcp processing. > > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Guys and gals, >> >> I have a mainline that attaches a subtask via an ATTACH macro, the subtask >> will do Some TCPIP work, all self contained, my question is the structure, >> i.e.; >> >> Mainline --> attach .......do work and post >> Check post ..detach? >> >> Is my thinking correct ? >> >> >> Scott ford >> www.identityforge.com >> from my IPAD >> >> 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means' >>
