On 2014-02-20 16:06, John Ehrman wrote: > > Addressability of the base location is a requirement for Dependent USINGs. > Who made that rule? Why? Can it be appealed? And why addressability with 12-bit displacement (you neglected or deliberately omitted to say that), rather than one of the longer displacement formats?
It's possible that the code for dependent USINGs starts by calling the existing ResolveBaseAnd12BitDisplacement routine and proceeds from there. That should have been redesigned when long displacements loomed into view going on 11 years ago. -- gil
