On 2014-06-07, at 10:06, John Gilmore wrote: > Bob Raicer can defend his own positions, but it does seem to me that > he made it clear, with appropriate extracts from the manual, that > DUMMY is usable only with BSAM, QSAM, and VSAM, i.e., not with BPAM. > Why are people fixated on BPAM? My assumption was that both SYSUT1 and SYSUT2 have (or can be treated as) DSORG=PS. BPAM is irrelevant, and as you say, DUMMY is usable with BSAM or QSAM.
-- gil
