That's just what I was considering for HLASM, but we ran out of time etc.
John Ehrman
(------------------ Referenced Note Follows --------------------)
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 01:14:03 -0400
From: Tony Harminc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HLASM doubleword set-symbol arithmetic
On 5 July 2014 11:55, Paul Gilmartin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> A less 'easy' alternative would be to introduce types, and associated
> instructions: GBLA32, GBLA64, SETA32, SETA64, EQU32, EQU64, ...
If someone for some reason decided to do it this way, I'd expect GBLG,
SETG, and so on...
Tony H.
