My post contains a typo or transmission error that rather destroys its usefulness.
The line |lus_64 seta BYTE(x'40) . . . was deprived of the two leading characters '&p'. It should be |&plus_64 seta BYTE(x'40') More generally, I would of course be enthusiastic about an assembler that generated code corresponding to what I had intended to write rather than what I did in fact write. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
