On 2014-08-17, at 16:43, J R wrote: > Binyamin suggested an S-con 0S(expression) > which would contain a base and displacement > BDDD. By "absolute value" the base would be zero. > I believe the only way to force an S-con to use a zero base is by DROPping all extant base registers. Otherwise the S-constant is free to use any available base to resolve the expression. Perhaps Binyamin meant to imply a PUSH-DROP-0S(EXPRESSION)-POP sequence. The unwary user should at least be warned of this.
-- gil
