The problem is that file manager see 2 separate dsects as as 2 records Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 6:10 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > The '0' in > > 0CL133 > > is called a duplication factor. It is not called a replication factor. > > Writing > > 11CL133 > > thus specifies 11 instances of 133 characters, and any duplication > factor of 0 specifies no instances, only alignment, so that 0H > specifies halfword alignment, 0F specifies fullword alignment, and 0D > specifies doubleword alignment. > > The assembler does not support the use of two repetition factors in > the same DC statement. > > If, as I half suspect, you want to support an array containing a > variable number N of elements, with 0 <= N <= 13, you can do that by > using a DSECT for an element and a separate count field for the value > of N if N is assembly-time bound. If N is execution-time boumnd you > may instead need two such count fields, one for current size and one > for a maximal size/element count. > > Finally, to repeat what others have said/implied, the sequence > > | DC 0C133 > | DC 0C133 > | . . . > | DC 0C133 > > leaves the location counter unchanged. > > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
