Dave asked:
> Why not do it as nested Ifs? I would dislike such a complex IF as you are
> describing in any language. What would this look like? When I originally
> did this, I had it as an IF/ELSE construct like below, but didn't like the
> duplicating of the code for 'Do Stuff'. I had it like this: IF A Do
> stuff ELSE IF (B OR C) AND D Do stuff ENDIF ENDIF Since there
> was just 1 test before the stuff in the 'ELSE' clause above, I thought it
> wouldn't be too bad to incorporate it into 1 'IF' statement. Is there a
> way to nest IFs to where the 'Do stuff' isn't duplicated? This is the only
> one I can see, but the first 'IF' is wasted if 'A' is true:
IF (ICM,R1,15,CtlBlk,M) LCR R1,R1,ENDIF
IF (TM,A,BIT,O),OR,(LTR,R1,R1,P),AND,(ICM,R1,15,FIELD(R1),NZ) Do stuffENDIF
