Interesting. I hope i never see code like this. ;-)
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:07 PM, John Ehrman <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve Smith asked for the answer to my quiz question of March 23: > > > While we're having fun: under what circumstances is the character > sequence > > > > (4)(3)(2)(1) > > > > legal as part of a machine instruction operand, not part of a quoted > > string, not part of a macro operand, and not part of a SETC statement? > > And no, it's not an "April-Fool" question. > Here's the answer: > USING *,12 > &V(4) SETC 'L' > LA 0,=A&V(4)(3)(2)(1) > END > > Try assembling it! (And no, it wasn't my idea originally.) > > Regards... John >
