On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:26:10 -0700, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 6/17/2015 2:55 PM, David Cole wrote: >> Excellent! Just stuff that into an ignorable dsect, and there you go! >> I never thought of this method. Very creative. > >We use the same basic technique in a robust set of macro-based math >functions to to ensure one EQU is greater or less than another, to >ensure a set of EQU values are all equal, to compute the max/min of the >set, etc. Such functions come in quite handy... > How do you get a min using that approach, Ed? I'd also be interested in how you test equality. I have one guess for equality, but I'm not sure it's the only way of doing it, and no ideas on min. Thanks, Walt
