>From what I've seen, the blank line is there, but SDSF doesn't honor carriage control (some online report viewers honor CC while others don't). Print it out and the blanks lines should be there.
MARK HAMMACK [email protected] 214-478-0955 K2MLH On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin < [email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-07-03, at 09:55, Robin Vowels wrote: > > > From: "Gary Weinhold" > > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 10:46 PM > > > > > >> We have ended up with many of these in our code because a senior > developer felt that too many single-usage labels cluttered the code and > made it less readable. (He also required that a blank line follow every > branch statement and precede the target of every branch, whether labeled or > not). ... > > > > Simply awful. > > > Senior? Senile? > > It sounds as if he coded: > > FOOBAR > BC CC,*+8 > > WOMBAT > > *+8 DS 0H > XYZZY > > I'd choose to do nothing of the sort, but if compelled, I'd do quite > the opposite and treat the implied "if" as a basic block: > > FOOBAR > > BC CC,*+8 > WOMBAT > *+8 DS 0H > > XYZZY > > (Grrr... HLASM allows me to use blank lines for legibility, then > omits them from the SYSPRINT for illegibility| Or is there an > option controlling this? But it's better than FAP, which treated > a blank line as "DC F'0'".) > > -- gil >
