Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> Which should be CICS-friendly.
>But does it meet the OP's performance requirement? Probably not, because you call CEELOCT using 4 parameters (in workspace) and depending on needs, may need also call CEEDATM after checking your CEELOCT output for validity. And there is probably LE overhead too for Assembler programs. After reviewing this discussion, I see that my proposed sample will NOT work for the OPs requirement. >The OP has alleged that the TOD clock value (STCK) is an input parameter, so >STCK(E) performance is irrelevant. Perhaps he should give an example (source snippets) of what he wants? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht
