Hey John, Yeah both ....we have a assembler routine that reads the subpool entries ( all that are there ) into a large array/table. But I have customers nervous that cant tell how much is in use or whats in the subpool.
So thats my situation, I figure dataspace is better. Our exits feed the RACF events to the subpool. Scott On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:37 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All, > > > > We in our product build a cache area in Subpool 231. It is build using a > > standard > > 'Storage Obtain' and use a token to anchor it. I need to monitor the > usage. > > I am not sure if I can without disturbing it. Am I correct in this > > assumption ? > > > > Scott > > > > B > y monitor, I take it you mean somehow trace when it is read or written? Or > do you mean that you want to know how entries in the cache are added & > deleted to watch something like a "high water mark" of how much of the > cache is used over time? > > > -- > A fail-safe circuit will destroy others. -- Klipstein > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown >
