NT services have a very short path length compared to most alternatives,
but are not as fast as a CVT or ECVT based anchor. However, if the data
is address-space or TCB related, rather than lpar-based, I wouldn't
think CVT or ECVT based anchors would work well. There are unsupported
techniques to access NT data more efficiently.
Gary
Gary Weinhold
Senior Application Architect
DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization
Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216
Email: [email protected]
Visit us online at www.DKL.com
E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
__________
On 2016-04-19 06:36, Willy Jensen wrote:
Interesting, I have seen N/T services being described as having a very short
path length, and do not require you to set up a save area. I'm not so sure
about using CVTUSER or like, someone else might want to use it too.
Willy
