What is your initial using for r13? Is DLTABLE part of that dsect? Just checked some code and USING (X,X@END),R11 Seems to work (at least it does for dasm).
A dependent using (from the active usings hdr): DBST(X'10994'),R11+X'32FC' X dsect has DBSTm DS XL(DBST$) The using is: USING DBST,DBSTm ...chris. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: December-20-16 10:15 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Bogus ASMA307E? Well, I found a work-around: * USING DLTABD,DLTABLE This fails w/ASMA307E USING DLTABD-4000,DLTABLE-4000 Trick to fool HLASM My brain exploded trying to figure out the workarounds in the old postings. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well if that's the design, then the design is an ass. But I don't see > how that's the case, as the manual says otherwise. > > I finally found Robert Ngan's nearly identical post from 2 years ago, > and several older ones, too. There was one reference that implied IBM > won't fix it because of "compatibility" issues. Frankly, that sounds > like a cop-out; it would be more understandable to just say that it's > not a high enough priority yet. > > And IBM hasn't bothered to update the manual either. Sheesh. > > Google was not my friend today. Apparently, the assembler-list > archives aren't Googleable. > > Is there an outstanding SHARE req. for this? > > sas > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Paul Gilmartin > <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc- requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote: > >> On 2016-12-20, at 09:13, Steve Smith wrote: >> >> > I'm getting an error on a dependent USING apparently just because >> > it's >> out >> > of the normal 12-bit offset range... >> > >> > This seems to be a HLASM bug to me. >> > >> No. WAD. This has been discussed here before. (No, I don't like >> it.) >> >> -- gil >> > > > > -- > sas > -- sas