>If you accept GOFF, of course each data CSECT can be named as the >parent CSECT with a distinctive suffix. E.g.: CODESECT.WtoText. >SMP/E is hostile to long names as ++MOD element names but friendly >to them in the CSECT() option. > >What's wrong with GOFF? > >-- gil
Nothing is wrong. I simply did not want my macro do be dependent on such options. -- Peter Hunkeler
