On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 11:22 AM, John McKown wrote: > >> BDAM is a "traditional" access method, like BSAM. So it cannot be >> _easily_ used by >> AMODE(31),RMODE(31) programs. >> > > Whaaaat?! AMODE(31) callers were supported by the very, very first release > of DFSMS! > Well, I don't do much basic I/O, so maybe I'm confused. But doesn't an AMODE(31) program require more work than AMODE(24) or maybe I'm thinking RMODE(31)? Or is that just for QSAM program (DCBE and so forth)? > Gosh I can't remember how many decades ago that was, but it's been a long, > long time... > > > -- > Phoenix Software International > Edward E. Jaffe > 831 Parkview Drive North > El Segundo, CA 90245 > http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ > -- I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it. Maranatha! <>< John McKown
