> > Except that he wanted the literal "pooling" that the assembler's logic > > provides: if you code =X'1234' twice, you only get one X'1234' literal. > > Apparently he has a LOT of literal data. > > > > Charles > > If that's really necessary, one could use a SETC array to track the values > defined so far for reuse.
Yup, that's what I might need to do. But I would be developing my own implementation of a mechanism that is available in the assembler. But I *just* can't leverage that mechanism in this particular situation and that is unfortunate. Fred! ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately. -----------------------------------------------------------------
