Sure, if you're doing ILC then you need to deal with implementations of the 
various languages. But that doesn't excuse making the implementation part of 
the language.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu> on behalf 
of Paul Gilmartin <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu>
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:58 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
Subject: Re: Pascal

On 2018-02-02, at 09:32:08, Seymour J Metz wrote:

> I prefer the PL/I solution,  does not specify how they are  implementedrr, 
> only how they behave. Other languages, e.g., Icon, Perl, do the same thig.
>
But it matters greatly in interfaces to other languages.

-- gil

Reply via email to