On 07/02/18 23:51, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Does GEN_MOVE, ZC_CONV, ZC_PACK31 (and other major macros) in zCOBOL
demonstrate enough of the OOP standard that our OOP evangelist here will
accept that OOP can be added to HLASM using macros such as those examples?
zCOBOL does not include any of the new object oriented COBOL features.
My message was a response to the rather broad claim tha
the functionality of any non-trivial macro cannot be made
"available / usable / maintainable in ANY other language"
--
Martin
Dr Martin Ward | Email: mar...@gkc.org.uk | http://www.gkc.org.uk
G.K.Chesterton site: http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc | Erdos number: 4
