<snip>
So when do you guys intend to add support beyond that?
</snip>

When there is another architecture levelset so that it makes sense for us 
to do that.
As far as I know, no z/OS macros generate different code based on machines 
newer than the most recent architecture levelset.

That is partly why I wrote that SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=xx is intended for 
notifying z/OS macros.

If there is a business need to provide such support in advance of an ALS, 
then submit an RFE and make your case.
Providing such support in the next release after a machine ships would be 
no problem; providing such support rolled back to all supported releases 
whenever a machine ships requires justification.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

Reply via email to