On Jun 19, 2019, at 11:31 AM, John McKown wrote:
> 
>  LLILH R15,ENTRY
> HLASM complains the ENTRY is either relocatable or unresolved. ..
>  
I’ve encountered the complementary inconsistency:
    LA    R15,=D’3.14’    works, but:
    DC    S(=D’3.14’)    fails.
So it can resolve a base-displacement in an instruction, but not
in a constant.  IBM is still uncomfortable with reusable code.

— gil

Reply via email to