If it goes beyond looking for the DDNAME and tries to use the JFCB address ... check for an ODD value for the JFCB address. JFCBs got moved around before z/OS (in the far ago fog). Use RDJFCB if its odd.
John -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Kuebbing Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 10:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: old code failing *** External email: Verify sender before opening attachments or links *** A subroutine written long ago appears to be failing. It looks for a DDname in the TIOT. Did the format of the TIOT change at some point? If yes, at what release? Does it matter if AMODE is 24 or 31? It might have something to do with the fact that the DD is a proc override instead of straight JCL or in a proc. Richard Kuebbing NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Unless you are the intended addressee, any review, reliance, dissemination, distribution, copying or use whatsoever of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please reply immediately and delete the material from all computers. Email sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not use email to send us confidential information such as credit card numbers, PIN numbers, passwords, Social Security Numbers, Account numbers, or other important and confidential information.
