On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > Empirically, it *is* necessary to explain that equating R0 though R15 to > register numbers other than the ones implicit in the names is a cardinal > sin. >
I ran into some code where the programmer decided to know better and had defined RA-RF and used that where he made his changes (and have me scratch my head about something keeping an address as return code). I did not friend him. Rob
