I did not realize that XF and F were different. Yes, I am using IFOX00.
On Thursday, June 4, 2020, 5:48:22 PM EDT, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]>
wrote:
I can't offer any guidance choosing between them, but G is just F with some
performance tweaks, so anything running on one should run on the other.
However, if XF also comes into the picture then there are some compatibility
issues.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [[email protected]] on behalf
of Doug Wegscheid [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 5:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Structured programing macros for MVS 3.8?
I just read the article that Sam Golob wrote about using structured programming
macros, as well as the discussion from last month.
Several alternatives were called out:
- Kessler's Concept 14
- Dan Snyder's collection
- Clemson University
- Yale HAL
Before I start digging into *all* of these to figure out which I want to use,
can anyone warn me away from any of them? I am constrained to using Assembler F
and Waterloo Assembler G (MVS 3.8J system)...
