On 2021-01-03, at 16:39:38, Gibney, Dave wrote: > > In the general case (amiglib perhaps an exception) to expect a DLIB > (HLQ.Axxxxxx) to provide valid executables. > Not in thee general case. A DLIB may contain objects which need to be linked with library subroutines to be valid executables. Is Metal C an exception?
When a tester reported an ABEND attempting to run one of our modules from a DLIB, I began intentionally marking objects in our DLIBs non-executable. -- gil
