"IBM Mainframe Assembler List" <[email protected]> wrote on
02/14/2022 12:05:20 PM:
> I would consider using TP to verify the signs and protect yourself from
> S0C7 on the subsequent handling of the packed number
Why would I get S0C7 due to an invalid sign when I'm using PKA
(not PACK) which ignores the original sign altogether and forces a
standard positive sign on output?
> I would not do anything against the number (no MHI or so)
Why not?
> - just EDMK it and place the sign(depending on the results of the
> previous tests) where ever it needs to be.
I can't do that because I'm using a generic, reusable routine to
convert binary to zoned and it can't see the original record data. It
only sees the data I pass to it in a 64-bit register. So the passed data
has to already have the correct sign.
Sincerely,
Dave Clark
--
int.ext: 91078
direct: (937) 531-6378
home: (937) 751-3300
Winsupply Group Services
3110 Kettering Boulevard
Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA
(937) 294-5331
*********************************************************************************************
This email message and any attachments is for use only by the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential, privileged and/or proprietary
information. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and delete and destroy the message and all
copies. All unauthorized direct or indirect use or disclosure of this
message is strictly prohibited. No right to confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any error in transmission.
*********************************************************************************************
