"IBM Mainframe Assembler List" <[email protected]> wrote on
08/17/2023 01:46:42 PM:
> I think the "program type value" would be more appropriate for that
> purpose. Although I don't see much benefit as stated, maybe it could
lead
> to some.
OK, I'm game to do something new. I can define it in the DF macro
but I don't know how to test for it in the other three macros. Hint?
As to the benefit, I see it as a way to make sure that the
supplied bit mask was correctly defined with the location as the value and
the bit mask as the length. Since this is a non-standard way of defining
a bit mask, I want some way of making sure that the operand for the SF,
CF, and TF macros was correctly defined.
Sincerely,
Dave Clark
--
int.ext: 91078
direct: (937) 531-6378
home: (937) 751-3300
Winsupply Group Services
3110 Kettering Boulevard
Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA
(937) 294-5331
*********************************************************************************************
This email message and any attachments is for use only by the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential, privileged and/or proprietary
information. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and delete and destroy the message and all
copies. All unauthorized direct or indirect use or disclosure of this
message is strictly prohibited. No right to confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any error in transmission.
*********************************************************************************************
