I'd have to get the exits into the CM environment, which I believe to be politically impossible.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf of Martin Trübner <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 11:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Hiding COPY text Shmuel, If you can get the parm (or a process)-stmt passed endavour, I can send you the source of the three-in-one-exit. It sits here on my machine. Right now it is coded to supporess copy or macro expansions, if they come from certain libraries, but changing the code to react only on certain copy/macros is a no-brainer. And of course the reaction to suppress everything but the first line regardless of print-stmts. That way someone can alsways have them printed (without the parm/process-stmt) or have the suppression working (with the stmt) Martin Am 23.02.24 um 15:34 schrieb Seymour J Metz: > I don't want to use PRINT OFF for the COPY of ASMMSP or IEABRC, but I don't > want to clutter up the listing. Is there an analog of PRINT NOGEN for code in > a COPY? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
