Was that really necessary? On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 05:31:20 +0000 Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
:>The objective is not to parse the operand, but that doesn't mean that you can achieve the objective without doing so. :>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz :>________________________________________ :>From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf of Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> :>Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 9:40 AM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: Why am I getting ASMA145E (was Re: Macro parameters: parsing a relocatable address) :>Yes, but the objective is not to parse the operand. :>On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 06:56:45 -0700 Paul Gilmartin :><[email protected]> wrote: :>:>On 2/27/24 05:21:41, Seymour J Metz wrote: :>:>> Because 24(R3) is not an expression. The second operand of the USING must be either a register number or a relocatable expression. . :>:>Rather than :>:> USING MY0004,24(R3) :>:>would :>:> USING MY0004-24,R3 :>:>have the desired effect? -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
