<http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/OS_VS/assembler/GC33-4010-5_OS_VS_DOS_VSE_VM_370_Assembler_Language_Mar79.pdf#page=5>
 page v. Note that only the two, not thr plethora available in HLASM.

-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf 
of Rupert Reynolds <00001bc7bfc4ffd1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2025 3:58 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Just for a Friday chuckle


External Message: Use Caution


Thanks for the reminder :-)

I was about to say that I think XF (IFOX00) doesn't support &SYSDATE or
&SYSTIME.
But I'm running TK5 update 3 and RPF option 4.1 works fine :-)

From the listing:-

>
>  EYECATCH DC    YL1(EYEEND-EYECATCH)
          DC    C'HELLO &SYSDATE. &SYSTIME. '
+         DC    C'HELLO 06/28/25 08.31 '

I'll update the all-singing, all-dancing RR_SAVE and RR_RET macros next :-)

Roops


On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 at 00:56, Gord Tomlin <gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com>
wrote:

> On 2025-06-27 15:50 PM, Rupert Reynolds wrote:
> > does anyone care to comment on whether
> > eyecatchers are any use these days
>
> In a word: yes.
> And they're better when they have an assembly time stamp.
>
>


Reply via email to