On 17/02/2026 18:52, Tony Harminc wrote:
I think your "clever code" would look a lot less confusing if you posted
the actual source code rather than a disassembly. All those hard to follow
EQUs wouldn't be there; rather, there would probably just be a handful of
ENTRY statements.
:-)
This *is* the actual source code!
I changed the original entry point names to XXXX and YYYY
to protect the guilty, but otherwise the labels and code
(and "hard to follow EQUs") are exactly as written in the source file.
It "assembles as intended" so it is "valid" (according to some!)
--
Martin
Dr Martin Ward | Email: [email protected] | http://www.gkc.org.uk
G.K.Chesterton site: http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc | Erdos number: 4
