On Oct 2, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Alan Robertson <[email protected]> wrote: > As you know, today, we don't have even a complete "basic" version. I'm > leaning towards favoring the Neo4j approach of having a basic capability > which is available under the GPL, with "enterprise" versions falling > under the AGPL. Or I could just make it AGPL starting from today.
I'm not familiar with AGPL, but I will read up on it. I tend to be more of a Berkeley-type license guy, but I know that doesn't necessarily work for everyone. That's why I like Creative Commons licensing, where you can choose a license that works more or less like Berkeley, or one that works more or less like GPL, or whatever. Of course, there may always be certain specific things that CC doesn't address. I will observe that simpler usually works better in the long run than "better". And I can tell you that I have already signed the Opscode Chef CLA, which I believe is similar to my very quick read of the Neo4j CLA. I also encouraged my previous employer to sign the Opscode Chef CCLA (Corporate Contributors License Agreement), and you may want to consider having a similar CLA/CCLA arrangement. -- Brad Knowles <[email protected]> LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu> _______________________________________________ Assimilation mailing list - Discovery-Driven Monitoring [email protected] http://lists.community.tummy.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/assimilation http://assimmon.org/
