Alan, [reposting after fixing my email address on the list]
I would suggest for your purposes you might want CreativeCommons-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. This would allow others to use the work commercially, redistribute the it with attribution that you specify, but would not allow them to modify it or make derivative works from it. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/deed.en_US Alternatively, if you wished to permit derivative works, you might use CreativeCommons-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US There are plenty of variations at the CreativeCommonds.org site, check it out. In any case you definitely want to put one of these on the documentation to prevent someone else from copyrighting your work and then suing you for infringement. -Charles On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Alan Robertson wrote: > Hi, > > Do folks have a set of favorite documentation licenses? > > I'm not as familiar with this as I am with software licenses. > > So, what are your thoughts? > > -- > Alan Robertson <[email protected]> - @OSSAlanR > > "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim > from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce > _______________________________________________ > Assimilation mailing list - Discovery-Driven Monitoring > [email protected] > http://lists.community.tummy.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/assimilation > http://assimmon.org/
_______________________________________________ Assimilation mailing list - Discovery-Driven Monitoring [email protected] http://lists.community.tummy.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/assimilation http://assimmon.org/
