On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Alan Robertson wrote: > Hopefully this won't occur again any time in the foreseeable future...
the conventional way the RFC's do this, so as to not have to rely on hope is to have a protocol version indicator (usually not more than 8 bits wide. pPssibly less if it can be 'over-loaded' by bit-mapping onto a small range value) in the headers, so that one might be strict in what one states, and liberal in what one receives -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ Assimilation mailing list - Discovery-Driven Monitoring [email protected] http://lists.community.tummy.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/assimilation http://assimmon.org/
