Fair enough if that's how it works, but I did notice bits of ASSP's code that performed functions against specific type of record found, and type SPF was not synonimous with TXT.
(sent while mobile) On 1/29/08, Andrew Macpherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Monday, January 28, 2008 15:36:51 -0500 Micheal Espinola Jr > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Speaking in terms of standards, record checks should include type SPF > | records along with type TXT. SPF checkers are supposed to look for > | either record type. > | > | Resource Record type 99 to was assigned as SPF by the IANA, in July 2005. > | This is intended to replace the use of TXT records, although both are > | valid and it will admittedly be many years before (if ever) TXT record > | use is phased out. > | > > That belongs in Mail::SPF or Mail::SPF::Query not in ASSP per se, and is > the responsibility of those maintaining that code > > -- > Andrew Macpherson, > OA5.com Ltd. Registered No.3952726 VAT: GB 750 7688 04 > The Red Lion #5. Much Hadham. Herts SG10 6DD. GB > Phone +44 1279 843147 GSM +44 78999 61797 Fax +44 7092 052800 > http://www.oa5.com/ OA5 is a member of ISPA-UK > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > -- ME2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
