Using .20 addresses appear in PBTrap even if listed in nopenaltymaketraps (looks like nopenaltymaketraps ain't working yet)
Additionally I found in PBTrap also [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] even if I have thisisjusttestletter@ as the first line of my spamtrap.txt file (the one I use for the manually maintained spamtrapaddresses) besides these problems, all the last build work smooth. Really fast and Cuncurent SMTP Sessions now is low again. Also avg. CPU usage is really low, so performance is not a problem also with all these new features. Additional I did some logfile analysis and for me (ymmv) the new PBTrap works better with a 3 days interval (and lots more hits), not with a single day refresh interval. Is that possible or I'm still not understanding the logic behind that test ? I usually run a script extracting the top invalid addresses over a 2weeks period. And that gives me a valuable source of spamtraps. Why do you suggest that one day is enough ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
