Where did you get the '0.6' from? Don't confuse it with the 'confidence factor' which is 0.6 in the default settings.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-test- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin > Sent: Friday, 28 March 2008 9:01 AM > To: ASSP development mailing list > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] rebuild 'norm' odd jump. > > Dickson, Paul wrote: > > My understanding is the closer to .6 it is, the more accurate the > > bayesian filter will be. > > That is incorrect. > The norm should be above 0.6 and below 1.4 to be considered "healthy". > The ideal norm is 1.0000, which is an even mix of spam and not-spam > weights. > > > > > Found 12836215 spam words, 12238641 non-spam words. > > > > norm=1.0488 > > This is a perfectly healthy corpus. > > If you are getting false positives perhaps you should remove any > spam/not-spam reports that are over a year old. > > Kevin > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/market > place > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
