Again, very good point. I used "bounce" becuase the legit sender will get a
bounce message, but you're right, it should have used the term "reject".
The code's still valid, let's just change everywhere that it says
BounceTheseLocalAddresses with RejectTheseLocalInvalidAddresses
How's that?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Charles Marcus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On 9/11/2008, Ken Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Good point. Technically, they are rejected with
> > 550 5.1.1 User unknown: EMAILADDRESS
> > which to the sender will be just like a bounce, but you're right, it's a
> rejection.
>
> This is not a mere technicality. ASSP is not BOUNCing the message, it is
> REJECTing it.
>
> The SENDING MTA is the one responsible for generating (or not) the
> BOUNCE to the sender.
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
>
> Charles
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
