GrayHat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreibt:
>Now; let's say ASSP receives a "tuple" (connecting IP, HELO,
>MAIL FROM, RCPT TO); ASSP will now be able to perform some
>checks (DNS lookup on the MX for th
 [ fcp://@fc.magicvillage.de,%231000789/Mailbox/ASSP-test/%23107791014
][Assp-test] [Feature] dynamic greylist by 
>e sending domain, SPF
>checks) and, if the sender is a "valid mail source" for a certain
>domain, ASSP shouldn't delay it and should instead add the
>domain/IP couple to an internal "nodelay list"
>
>I think that the above may allow to fully exploit the graylisting
>power and at the same time won't unnecessary introduce
>delays for "valid" mailservers :)

ASSP in 1.4.3 series  does this already, but not for the actual
message, but for the history of the IP.
That is one of the functions of the Penalty WhiteBox. It works even
without using PenaltyBox for blocking.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to