>> some mail servers are unable to talk to these modules (SSL) - >And some clients under some circumstances, but not under other >circumstances.
>> and yes this could be OS dependent. >Do we yet have any idea why this is the case? and, if so, what does >that say about the chances of finding a fix/workaround? One (I think the most possible) reason is using old modules versions or having them wrong installed! But if it is realy OS dependend, I've no idea - I'm unable to test on every OS and hardware! A possible workaraound is to exclude failing IP's from using TLS/SSL. ASSP it self excludes failing (TLS/SSL) IP's for 24h from using TLS/SSL after the first mistake! It could help to have a complete debug file for such single connection (IP based)! Better also having the output to STDERR with SSLdebug set to level 3. 1. start ASSP from commandline (only 2.0.1_RC0.4.01 or higher) 2. set debugIP to the every time failing IP - set SSLdebug to level 3 - set ConnectionLog to verbose (not to diagnostic !!!) - wait until all workers have got the new config (5 seconds) 3. start the connection (try to use as less data as possible) and wait until both connections (client and server) are disconnected (even if they are running in to SMTP timeout) 4. send me the debug file and the console output Thomas Trevor Jacques <[email protected]> 24.08.2009 14:43 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> An ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> Kopie Thema Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: General 2.x questions > V2 is running in production for more than a year now (not every > release - but the most) I've been running v2 in production for about that long. It's been pretty stable, with only a very few, sometime significant glitches. :-) v2 is beta, but it's been closer to production-ready than many published products I've seen. > some mail servers are unable to talk to these modules (SSL) - And some clients under some circumstances, but not under other circumstances. > and yes this could be OS dependent. Do we yet have any idea why this is the case? and, if so, what does that say about the chances of finding a fix/workaround? Thanks. T. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test DISCLAIMER: ******************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email! ******************************************************* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
