On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> schreibt:
>> Why should an IPv4 encapsulated address raise the score so high that
>> it values the email to be tagged as spam when there was nothing other
>> that this to add to the spam score?
>
>
> Sorry, but I could not see that in your posting.
> Is this address not in the PBBlackBox? There is usually the last event
> stored which increased the score.
>
No sure isn't. Here's the entire headers:
X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.2(0.0.03) on assp.oitc.com
X-Assp-Delay: de...@captainsball.net was delayed for 1h 30m; 29 Jun 2011
17:33:01 -0400
X-Assp-Envelope-From: bounce-2314202-921145-debra=captainsball....@mcsv158.net
X-Assp-Intended-For: de...@captainsball.net
X-Assp-ID: assp.oitc.com 30938-00304
X-Assp-Spam: YES
X-Assp-Original-Subject: St. John's eNews for July 3, 2011
X-Spam-Status:yes
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: score for ::ffff:69.20.90.33 is 640, surpassing extreme
level of 500
Received: from mcsv158.net ([::ffff:69.20.90.33] helo=mcsv158.net) by
assp.oitc.com with ESMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.2); 29 Jun 2011 17:33:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mcsv158.net;
h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
i=eric=3dstjohnsmlb....@mcsv158.net;
bh=T90rUzrOkLYb9dVx0rHi/HVmNFc=;
b=GBuzBqO1KLtsiuqLQJPpqp7vC6VaC26yQ+/andKbHTljeY9tZwdSWaME5j6tIKeFvLCsggp9U7NN
tTH+QzdbtQk3jNIFKmHhfvDugt6ESM1tFjmOtCSqmXTaug40UqQ2bzx2YItYQaoDHE3U/Kb3sLOl
6Pf/0edWRZz/zi1gD2E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mcsv158.net;
b=H6C0uhMdxcxpzap4DPW4xRiFrYoYTEeNjP+n1/U0+BStBwx1QFmDziHDqInGnDt+Enxa2RxjqVDS
/p3WJxMoDjzw8xEPp04rlp6BJZS0Tq1lIChHTQ+jZFmf2dGWT+QQAb9+BP01N4UtydZ56pFzlSel
rTDkGTazCv9peq7uzJ0=;
Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mcsv158.net (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r16) id
h1ed0q0lj3gs for <de...@captainsball.net>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:03:01 -0400
(envelope-from <bounce-2314202-921145-debra=captainsball....@mcsv158.net>)
Subject: St. John's eNews for July 3, 2011
From: "St. John's Episcopal Church" <e...@stjohnsmlb.org>
Reply-To: "St. John's Episcopal Church" <e...@stjohnsmlb.org>
To: "Debra" <de...@captainsball.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:03:01 -0400
Message-ID: <1fb0d2b722cf48dbc4811b4fca7f9a9d52d.20110629200...@mcsv158.net>
X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID48de226aefa7f9a9d52d**
X-Campaign: mailchimp1fb0d2b722cf48dbc4811b4fc.48de226aef
X-campaignid: mailchimp1fb0d2b722cf48dbc4811b4fc.48de226aef
x-im: 38509-48de226aef
X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here:
http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=1fb0d2b722cf48dbc4811b4fc&id=48de226aef&e=a7f9a9d52d
x-accounttype: ff
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:unsubscribe-1fb0d2b722cf48dbc4811b4fc-48de226aef-a7f9a9d...@mailin1.us2.mcsv.net?subject=unsubscribe>,
<http://stjohnsmlb.us2.list-manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=1fb0d2b722cf48dbc4811b4fc&id=d4a77d96f8&e=a7f9a9d52d&c=48de226aef>
Sender: "St. John's Episcopal Church" <eric=stjohnsmlb....@mcsv158.net>
x-mcda: FALSE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_MCPart_2145576541"
MIME-Version: 1.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
