On 4 Aug 2011 at 9:13, GrayHat wrote:

> > Please read the originating mail again and you will find this: "
> > blocked by denySMTPConnections or droplist strict: 14.0.0.0/8"
> 
> >> Aug-03-11 08:32:04 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DenyStrict] 216.32.180.12
> >> <tho...@universal.bm> to: ksm...@bldc.com blocked by
> >> denySMTPConnections or droplist strict: 14.0.0.0/8
> 
> This makes no sense; sounds like ASSP went crazy, see, the sending
> IP is 216.32.180.12 and ASSP is saying it blocked the email since it
> matched 14.0.0.0/8 (that is the range 14.0.0.0 to 14.255.255.255) now...
> don't you think that such match is totally wrong :) ? It's just a matter
> of playing with a little bit of subnetting math :)

<cough>

Does this have anything to do with the discussion on Monday re assp picking out 
a software 
version number in the received headers as an ip address?  In that case it was 
"(ecelerity 
2.2.3.46 r())" and Thomas suggested:

> putting '2.2.3.46' in to 'noDelay' is the better way (not 
> 'noBlockingIPs' and 'noRBL')!

paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry&reg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. 
Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies.
Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to