> -----Original Message----- > From: Grayhat [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP and spamtraps > > > > I wouldn't say that they only receive junk. In a business > > > environment previous employees' addresses could eventually make it > > > on that list > > > > No, that list isn't there for such a purpose; there's another one > > which deals with the above > > that is "RejectTheseLocalAddresses"; the spamtraps on the other hands are > either manually populated with addresses NEVER assigned to users or, if you > enable it, with addresses automatically collected
Perhaps I misunderstood your question or I took it out of context. My comment was for the last part of your statement, " I mean, given that those addresses *are* traps so they don't belong to any "human" and, by definition, they only receive junk; why not using them to ALSO improve the bayes spam corpus" If you have "DoPenaltyMakeTraps" set to "use for spamaddresses", then in any corporate situation where an employee no longer exists with a valid email address, it doesn't mean that, "by definition, they only receive junk". They may still be receiving newsletters that other employees in the company are also receiving. By considering, as you're saying, then those newsletters may end up being considered junk by bayes as well. I know I'm reaching a little bit, but that's all I was saying. Kind Regards, Brett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
