>I see, so, basically, you're saying that the weight reported in the
"rebuild report" isn't correct ?
No - the values were correctly shown. But ASSP has used all files (up to
MaxFiles) even it was better to use some less ( from here or there) to get
a better corpusnorm.
Thomas
Von: Grayhat <[email protected]>
An: [email protected],
Datum: 11.09.2012 15:25
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: strange ASSP behavior
> Andrea,
Hi there, Thomas, we are on the public list, aren't we :) ?
> your request was very logical.
Well... to tell it all, I reported about such a behavior here and
there, but then, I didn't really pay attention to it... until I was
forced to setup a script, scheduled at intervals, to "trim" the corpus
and restore it to "normal" and, sincerely, given that ASSP has options
to deal with this, I think ASSP *should* deal with this :) and keep the
corpus balanced
> Why is assp not able to produce a fine corpusnorm/spamdb/HMM, if all
> information is available and the folders are full of files?
> Had a sleepness night. I think I've found a way to fix this.
Now ... you make me feel somewhat guilty !! Sleep is a need and
sincerely, causing a sleepless night isn't exactly something I like to
cause (ok, given that the night went wasted thinking to code <grin>)
> After the error folders are processed, a temporary corpusnorm is
> calculated. The files in the spam and notspam folder are counted -
> and depending on the temp-corpusnorm, the spam-file-count and
> notspam-file-count, the apx. required count of spam files is
> calcuated. If these spam files are finished processed - based on the
> needed notspam word count - the apx. required count of notspam files
> is calculated.
>
> So (I hope), even if a machine gets too many or too less spams over a
> time , this logic will be able to ensure a fine corpusnorm.
I see, so, basically, you're saying that the weight reported in the
"rebuild report" isn't correct ?!? Not that it's an issue, I can live
with that but... did I get it right ? (sorry if I didn't but last night
I slept 2 hours +/- [yeah, I know, but I was dealing with some *darn*
UTM issues and had to "protect the innocent"] and today I had to travel
@ a customer site... just got back) If so, then, maybe slightly
changing the rebuild code to emit correct values may be a good idea :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
