Thomas,

The top of the file told the story. I upgraded an idle virtual, which I 
thought had all of the same settings. Copied that virtual to an active. 
Updated the names and IP addresses.

I will run a diff against the original that was replaced.

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)

On 9/3/2013 3:04 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> I don't see a history file. Are you referring to assp.cfg.bak?
>
> There is no way to don't have it if you use assp.
>
> Have a look in to folder 'notes' - or simply use the link in the GUI ->
> left menu -> config changes history
>
>
>
>
> Von:    Michael Thomas <m...@mathbox.com>
> An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>,
> Datum:  03.09.2013 08:41
> Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: DKIM or spamlover
> issue No RBL checks
>
>
>
> Thomas,
>
>   > ASSP has a config change history !
>
> I don't see a history file. Are you referring to assp.cfg.bak?
>
> Michael Thomas
> Mathbox
> 978-687-3300
> Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
>
> On 9/3/2013 2:21 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>> ASSP has a config change history !
>>
>> If there is no entry there - assp.cfg was modified outside any assp API.
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>> Von:    Michael Thomas <m...@mathbox.com>
>> An:     assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net,
>> Datum:  03.09.2013 08:16
>> Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] Antwort:  DKIM or spamlover issue No RBL
>> checks
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Sorry. I was completely baffled by this issue.
>>
>> On checking your points below, I checked and found ValidateRBL set to
>> disabled. ValidateRBL has always been set to score.
>>
>> I did not explicitly change that setting. What would cause ValidateRBL
>> to become set to disabled?
>>
>> Michael Thomas
>> Mathbox
>> 978-687-3300
>> Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
>>
>> On 9/3/2013 1:52 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
>>> 3. Expectation: I would have expected the following headers in the
>>> message.
>>> Expected but absent headers
>>> ================================
>>> X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 100 (DNSBL: failed, 124.247.247.100 listed in
>>>                     blocklist.mathbox.net)
>>> X-Assp-DNSBL: failed, 124.247.247.100 listed in
>>> (blocklist.mathbox.net<-127.0.0.2; )
>>> X-Assp-Spam: YES
>>> X-Assp-Block: NO (Spamlover)
>>> ================================
>>>
>>> DNSBL check is not done -> no header
>>> check the following settings:
>>>
>>> AddSpamHeader
>>> AddCustomHeader
>>> AddSpamReasonHeader
>>> AddScoringHeader
>>> AddLevelHeader
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Issue: Headers indicate DKIM check was performed and passed. No
>>> indication in log files that DKIM check was performed. There are
> entries
>>> for DMARC.
>>>
>>> If assp says DKIM was done - it was done. Possibly only the precheck,
> if
>>> the mail was not completely received or it was modified by assp anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The IP address, 124.247.247.100, is DNS black listed locally by me.
>>>
>>> Nice idea to have a local DNSBL provider daemon.
>>> How ever, the header is only added if the check is done and
> AddRBLHeader
>>> is set.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Von:    Michael Thomas <m...@mathbox.com>
>>> An:     ASSP development mailing list
> <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>,
>>> Datum:  02.09.2013 22:28
>>> Betreff:        [Assp-test] DKIM or spamlover issue No RBL checks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thomas,
>>>
>>> X-Assp-Version: 2.3.4(13233)
>>>
>>> There were three messages received, one each on three different ASSP.
>>> All ASSP were running the same version. All messages from same sender.
>>> All messages to same domain, but different recipients. All three
>>> instances filtered identically. The messages were received at different
>>> times; 1:02, 1:03, and 1:14.
>>>
>>> The recipient domain is in spamlover.
>>>
>>> The IP address, 124.247.247.100, is DNS black listed locally by me. Has
>>> been black listed for weeks.
>>>
>>> 1. Issue: Note that in the Mail analyzer results, the IP address
>>> triggered an "RBLCheck returned FAILED". Log file indicates it knows
> the
>>> IP addresses involved. However, in log files, there is no indication
>>> that an RBL check was run. Log file indicates URIBL checks were run.
>>> Headers do not indicate RBL failure.
>>>
>>> 2. Issue: Headers indicate DKIM check was performed and passed. No
>>> indication in log files that DKIM check was performed. There are
> entries
>>> for DMARC.
>>>
>>> 3. Expectation: I would have expected the following headers in the
>>> message.
>>>
>>> Expected but absent headers
>>> ================================
>>> X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 100 (DNSBL: failed, 124.247.247.100 listed in
>>>                     blocklist.mathbox.net)
>>> X-Assp-DNSBL: failed, 124.247.247.100 listed in
>>> (blocklist.mathbox.net<-127.0.0.2; )
>>> X-Assp-Spam: YES
>>> X-Assp-Block: NO (Spamlover)
>>> ================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pertinent log entries
>>> ================================
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:06 [Worker_1] Info: enhanced Originated IP detection
>>> ignored IP's: 209.85.160.54
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:06 [Worker_1] Info: enhanced Originated IP detection
>>> found IP's: 124.247.247.100
>>> .
>>> .
>>> .
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:07 [Worker_1] Info: try DMARC
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:07 [Worker_1] Info: looking for DMARC in
>> _dmarc.gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:07 [Worker_1] Info: got RR _dmarc.gmail.com -
> "v=dmarc1;
>>> p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:07 [Worker_1] Info: got DMARC rua =
>>> mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:07 [Worker_1] Info: got DMARC p = none
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:07 [Worker_1] Info: got DMARC v = dmarc1
>>> .
>>> .
>>> .
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Sending DNS(A)-query to 208.69.48.6[:53]
>>> on blockuri.mathbox.net for URIBL checks on gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Sending DNS(TXT)-query to
> 208.69.48.6[:53]
>>> on blockuri.mathbox.net for URIBL checks on gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Sending DNS(A)-query to 208.69.48.6[:53]
>>> on multi.surbl.org for URIBL checks on gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Sending DNS(TXT)-query to
> 208.69.48.6[:53]
>>> on multi.surbl.org for URIBL checks on gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Sending DNS(A)-query to 208.69.48.6[:53]
>>> on black.uribl.com for URIBL checks on gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Sending DNS(TXT)-query to
> 208.69.48.6[:53]
>>> on black.uribl.com for URIBL checks on gmail.com
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:08 [Worker_1] Commencing URIBL checks on 'gmail.com'
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:09 [Worker_1] Got 3 answers, 3 replies and 0 hits after
>>> 1 seconds for URIBL checks on 'gmail.com'
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:09 [Worker_1] Got OK replies from (blockuri.mathbox.net
>>> multi.surbl.org) - NOTOK replies from () for URIBL on 'gmail.com'
>>> 13-Sep-02 01:02:09 [Worker_1] Completed URIBL checks on 'gmail.com'
>>> ================================
>>>
>>>
>>> Mail Analyzer with Full headers intact
>>> =========================================
>>>
>>> analyze is restricted to a maximum length of 10966 bytes
>>>      ASSP-ID: mx03-scanner.mathbox.net 98124-08976
>>> ASSP-Session: 31DE1B24 (mail 1)
>>> removed all local X-ASSP- header lines for analysis
>>>
>>> sender and reply addresses:
>>>      From: rebecca53...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> recipient addresses:
>>>      To: recipi...@recipientdomain.tld
>>> using enhanced Originated IP detection
>>> using enhanced Originated IP detection
>>>      •detected IP's on the mail routing way: 124.247.247.100(no PTR)
>>> 209.85.160.54(no PTR)
>>>      •detected source IP: 124.247.247.100
>>>
>>>      Feature Matching:
>>>
>>> • Strict SPF RE: '@gmail.com'
>>>       • matching strictSPFRe(file:files/strictspf.txt[line 1]):
>> '@gmail.com'
>>>      • DKIM-check returned OK failed
>>>      • URIBL check: 'OK'
>>>      • RBLCheck returned FAILED for 124.247.247.100: DNSBL: failed,
>>> 124.247.247.100 listed in blocklist.mathbox.net
>>>      • RBLCheck returned OK for 209.85.160.54:
>>> • domain gmail.com has valid MXA record: gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
>>> 173.194.75.26
>>>      • RWLcheck returned OK for : status=unknown
>>>      =========================================
>>>
>>>
>>> Message Headers
>>> =========================================
>>> Received: from mx03.mathbox.net [208.69.48.43] by mail.mathbox.com
>>>       (SMTPD-8.22) id ABD904C4; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 01:02:17 -0400
>>> Received: from mx03-scanner.mathbox.net ([208.69.48.43])
>>>                     by mx03.mathbox.net
>>>                     ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 01:02:09 -0400
>>> Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]
>>> helo=mail-pb0-f54.google.com)
>>>                     by mx03-scanner.mathbox.net with SMTP (2.3.4); 2 Sep
>> 2013
>>> 01:02:03 -0400
>>> Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ro12so4264446pbb.41
>>>             for <recipi...@recipientdomain.tld>; Sun, 01 Sep 2013
> 22:02:04
>>> -0700 (PDT)
>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>>             d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>>             h=message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:to:from:date;
>>>             bh=kCGVJWrIAJWKkBYLVR6xvpkK12INZ/TU80ZYudztIyE=;
>>>
>>> b=bssct9d/08eKZ/Uc+eShocjHI1B7+7tc8jNa2q3ASuQeQyvzwisFArOY2ds99yrCYI
>>>
>>> WdSc0Yk6vKDNX15JwWiEtPpIlhwdrj5CMMP8vDvZ+7pveNkuUDHdYjGL5gZ167f8KFVK
>>>
>>> oNLMrG0napphog3S41M/pyfL7KeSDjc+FxNUwbw/haQRbTzUtWlEWzKTiXu9e4mOAK4Y
>>>
>>> RLTUujD/agTtnYxMnkbG0dM/09Z/66wUUAXVQsded1alFldBYGSDbhw7Cr+iVjEk0hM+
>>>
>>> JFkJ4YmvJxePmDFNq4Jm9kFOR4tk/AlI/30tbQnKOm67PUZu36evqvbk1h8jt8rNaPlZ
>>>              i+lw==
>>> X-Received: by 10.68.102.165 with SMTP id
>>> fp5mr23501977pbb.83.1378098124518;
>>>             Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
>>> Return-Path: <rebecca53...@gmail.com>
>>> Received: from optif-4.optifserver.com ([124.247.247.100])
>>>             by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
>>> mz5sm13200256pbc.18.1969.12.31.16.00.00
>>>             (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
>>>             Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
>>> Message-ID: <52241bcb.25d3440a.6dda.7...@mx.google.com>
>>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>> boundary="===============1389920264=="
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> Subject: Fws:Sales and Marketing lead data september 2013.
>>> To: recipi...@recipientdomain.tld
>>> From: "Emma" <rebecca53...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:32:00 +0530
>>> X-Assp-ID: mx03-scanner.mathbox.net 98124-08976
>>> X-Assp-Session: 31DE1B24 (mail 1)
>>> X-Assp-Detected-RIP: 124.247.247.100
>>> X-Assp-Source-IP: 124.247.247.100
>>> X-Assp-Envelope-From: rebecca53...@gmail.com
>>> X-Assp-Intended-For: recipi...@recipientdomain.tld
>>> X-Assp-Version: 2.3.4(13233) on mx03-scanner.mathbox.net
>>> X-Assp-Re-SPFstrict: @gmail.com
>>> X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx03-scanner.mathbox.net;
>>>                     dkim=pass spf=pass
>>> X-Assp-Remote-Outbound-IP: 209.85.160.54
>>> X-Assp-Detected-URI: gmail.com(4)
>>> X-Assp-DKIM: verified-OK
>>> =========================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
>>> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft
>> technologies
>>> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
>>> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
>>>
>>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Assp-test mailing list
>>> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
>> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft
>> technologies
>> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
>> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
>>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER:
>> *******************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
> legally
>> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of
> the
>>
>> individual to whom it is addressed.
>> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>> known virus in this email!
>> *******************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
>> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft
> technologies
>> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
>> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
>>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft
> technologies
> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
>
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to