>>I can't see that the mail is rejected. >>Yes, this is by design. There is no special collection rule for the case >>(spam/discard.. and forward spam) if a spamlover is detected
I think you are right. Msg was delivered both to recipient and to spfSpamLovers. It would be great if in some future assp code would be modified so that message would not be duplicated (not sent to spfSpamLovers) if recipient was a spamlover. Thanks for the help. 2015-04-14 7:24 GMT+02:00 Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>: > >email is still rejected > > I can't see that the mail is rejected. > > >and also sent to sendAllSpam > > Yes, this is by design. There is no special collection rule for the case > (spam/discard.. and forward spam) if a spamlover is detected. > > Thomas > > > > Von: "krz...@gmail.com " <krz...@gmail.com> > An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum: 13.04.2015 16:16 > Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] bug in ValidateSPF/spfSpamLovers > > > > ValidateSPF= block > spfValencePB = 0 > kont...@receiver.pl is on spfSpamLovers but email is still rejected and > also sent to sendAllSpam > > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 30187-703896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 176.12.214.233 < > m.b...@sender.pl> to: kont...@receiver.pl SPF: found SPAMMER SPF > record/mechanism 'v=spf1 a mx ip4:0.0.0.0' for domain adawards.pl - SPF > result is set to 'fail' > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 30187-703896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [SPF][sl] > 176.12.214.233 <m.b...@sender.pl> to: kont...@receiver.pl [spam found] and > possibly passing because spamlover for this check, otherwise blocked (SPF > fail) [RE Przypomnienie o niezap aconej fakturze proforma] -> > /usr/assp/discarded/RE_Przypomnienie_o_niezap_acon--201412.eml > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 30187-703896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 176.12.214.233 < > m.b...@sender.pl> to: kont...@receiver.pl deleting spamming safelisted > tuplet: (176.9.24.0,adawards.pl) age: 0s > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 30187-703896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 176.12.214.233 < > m.b...@sender.pl> to: kont...@receiver.pl Message-Score: added -5 for Home > Country Bonus DE (HETZNER ONLINE AG), total score for this message is now > -5 > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 30187-703896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 176.12.214.233 < > m.b...@sender.pl> to: kont...@receiver.pl Whitelisted sender address: > m.b...@sender.pl for recipient kont...@receiver.pl > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 30187-703896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [Whitelisted] > 176.12.214.233 <m.b...@sender.pl> to: kont...@receiver.pl whitelisted > (attachments unchecked) [RE Przypomnienie o niezap aconej fakturze > proforma] -> /usr/assp/notspam/RE_Przypomnienie_o_niezap_acon--201412.eml > 2015-04-13 15:03:07 [Worker_1] 176.12.214.233 <m.b...@sender.pl> to: > kont...@receiver.pl info: message forwarded to kontakt-s...@receiver.pl > > > > 2015-04-11 8:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>: > > > >score (3) actualy requires > > DoPenaltyMessage to be enabled > > > > What an enormus awarness! > > > > > > >This is very counterintuivie and unlike > > other assp tests. > > > > This is the same behavior for all checks - it is common for assp - and > has > > to be known! > > > > read > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/ASSP%20V2%20multithreading/assp_check_order.txt/download > > > > > >full message (after DATA) > > > > ???? > > The first data received after the DATA command is the mail header. The > > header is processed line by line after it is completely received. > > ValidateSPF is a header check. > > Only if the mail is not blocked in the header part of a mail, the body > of > > the mail is processed. > > > > > > >That means assp could and > > should forward rejected email to sendAllSpam > > > > yes > > > > >(but usualy does not(?)) > > > > I don't think that this is true - but simply show the log (set > > ConnectionLog + SessionLog high) for such a mail. Means, a mail that is > > blocked in the body part (NOT the header). > > How ever keep in mind, that there are several exceptions where a blocked > > mail is not forwarded. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > Von: "krz...@gmail.com " <krz...@gmail.com> > > An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Datum: 10.04.2015 20:04 > > Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] bug in ValidateSPF/spfSpamLovers > > > > > > > > >>YES - it is blocked by the penalty box > > > > I see. I've tested that ValidateSPF = score (3) actualy requires > > DoPenaltyMessage to be enabled. This is very counterintuivie and unlike > > other assp tests. That also means that ValidateSPF = score is actualy > not > > affected by spfSpamLovers at all but instead is affected by pbSpamLovers > - > > very counter intutitive and I think additional description > > under ValidateSPF should be added to inform about this. This solves > > original issue of spfSpamLovers not working for ValidateSPF = score > > > > > > >> If a mail is blocked while the header is received, no spam forwarding > > will > > >> be done - it is useless to forward empty mails (mails without a > body). > > > > both in ValidateSPF = score or ValidateSPF = block assp rejects email > > after reciving full message (after DATA), not before (I'm testing this > > extensively by doing manual smtp sessions). That means assp could and > > should forward rejected email to sendAllSpam and in fact it sometimes > does > > (but usualy does not(?)) > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > > exercises > > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > > event?utm_ > > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > > _______________________________________________ > > Assp-test mailing list > > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > ******************************************************* > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > legally > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > the > > > > individual to whom it is addressed. > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > > known virus in this email! > > ******************************************************* > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > > exercises > > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > > event?utm_ > > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > > _______________________________________________ > > Assp-test mailing list > > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
