>
> http://www.senderbase.org/lookup/ip/?search_string=38.100.169.66
>
> :)
>
> Sorry Greyhat, you lost me. What does this show different from what I was
saying? Maybe I wasn't clear.
When I pull up the analyze interface in assp it shows only Cogent, doesn't
show e.delta.com, do it's not a match to my regex, and thereby doesn't get
the whitesenderorg bonus.
And here's another issue I'm seeing with Senderbase:
12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to: u...@ourcharity.org
DKIM-Signature found
12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to: u...@ourcharity.org
info: domain emails.snapfish.com has published a DMARC record
[MissingMX] 12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to:
u...@ourcharity.org [scoring] MX missing: emails.snapfish.com
12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to: u...@ourcharity.org
Message-Score: added 10 (mxValencePB) for MX missing: emails.snapfish.com,
total score for this message is now 10
12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to: u...@ourcharity.org HMM
Check [scoring] - Prob: 1.00000 => spam
12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to: u...@ourcharity.org
Message-Score: added 49 for HMM Probability: 1.0000, total score for this
message is now 59
12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to: u...@ourcharity.org
deleting spamming safelisted tuplet: (12.130.137.0,envfrm.rsys2.com) age: 2s
[MessageLimit] 12.130.137.89 <snapfish.4...@envfrm.rsys2.com> to:
u...@ourcharity.org [spam found] (MessageScore 59, limit 50) [Hours left
Get your gifts in time for Mother s Day with free overnight shipping] ->
messages/spam/Hours_left_Get_your_gifts_in_time_for_Mother_s_Day_with_free--2903.txt;
The from IP in the Responsys network, and I've got that network whitelisted
in my senderbasewhite org config. I've got senderbase set to score.
Senderbase logging is set to normal.
In the ASSP analyze interface, it shows a WHITE match as it should)
12.130.137.89 SenderBase: status=white SenderBase, data=US,
RESPONSYS, , , Y, 22
but where's the senderbase line in the log?
The message still got a score of 59 (10 for no MX record, 49 for HMM
fail). Yes HMM is totally wrong and clearly needs to be trained better,
but the -35 white sworgValencePB doesn't seem to get applied. I would have
expected a score of 24, which would have let this pass instead of be
blocked.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
